<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Pages on Mohit Arora</title><link>https://mohit.ar/pages/</link><description>Recent content in Pages on Mohit Arora</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-ca</language><atom:link href="https://mohit.ar/pages/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>AI in Canadian Healthcare</title><link>https://mohit.ar/ai-in-canadian-healthcare/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://mohit.ar/ai-in-canadian-healthcare/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Artificial intelligence is already making decisions inside Canada&amp;rsquo;s healthcare system. The tools doing that work were built without the people most exposed to their harm, and the results are predictable: efficiency first, the person second.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I keep a set of questions close: who shapes the logic, who carries the cost when it fails, what it actually takes to change the order of priority. This is where I work through them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Mohit Arora</title><link>https://mohit.ar/ora/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://mohit.ar/ora/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;The decisions that shape health care in Canada were not made by the people who depend on it most. That isn&amp;rsquo;t an accusation — it&amp;rsquo;s a design condition. What gets measured, what counts as an outcome, who has standing to name harm when it happens: those choices were made before most patients arrived in the room, and the rooms were arranged accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been navigating Canada&amp;rsquo;s healthcare system as a long-term patient. The work I do now is a direct extension of that: I want the people most affected by health systems to have real authority in shaping them — not just a seat at a table that was set without them.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>